🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, according to a recent study conducted in Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical parties by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The findings, published in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German publications.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to central themes like assimilation and migration, mainstream political groups increasingly adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was evident even when mainstream groups were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Across Europe

While the study was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations throughout Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European news outlets," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a former national leader called for widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to France embrace the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the radical right, despite studies suggests that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The scope of information collected revealed that the impact of far-right parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around migration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Need for Established Groups to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their own discourses, particularly on subjects such as migration and integration, instead of continuously following the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."